[Edited 19 January – pic added]
Coming back from the USA I was initially denied boarding in Dulles Airport. They said, according to Chinese regulations, you need to have a return ticket (to leave China again) or a “residence permit”. That is what the computer said, “with the latest update”. I have a visa (5 years), valid till early 2008 but that was not enough. They asked for my driver’s license (hey, we are in the USA where they still did not invent the ID card). Unfortunately I did have nothing with me – only my European driver’s license (why should I take my Chinese one along to the US?). I also did not bring my “Green Book” (few people still have this document… except me…), not to take along documents you don’t need and only can lose. Nobody ever asked the question before and I have never seen the Chinese immigration ask for your air ticket. In Thailand this is known so people are supposed to have one. As I live here, I buy a return ticket in Beijing – I never know where I will travel to next time.
Finally they let me go – after 40 minutes of discussion.
Once back, I started checking and found indeed some interesting facts:
– the Green Booklet I had left behind is actually called … Residence Permit
– new Chinese visas issued are now different – they read on top “Residence Permit”. They are also totally different in text and details. My visa is old and at that time only mentioned the category “Z-Visa” (= working permitted), actually equal to Residence Permit… but that is not explained in the information the check-in people have.
So, you know. Better check your visa and be prepared! Or they won’t let you return “home” unless you buy a new ticket…
Exit procedures in the USA are also confusing. Yes, you are to hand over the “visa waiver” stapled inside your passport (as in my case) to the airline staff when boarding for your international flight, so you “officially left” the USA. In principle the USA does not have exit immigration control. Well, kind of.
Well, I had the unique experience of CHECKING OUT IN IMMIGRATION. When waiting for my flight Chicago – Beijing I saw a lonely lady standing between toilets and other booths next to two terminals that looked like ATMs. I asked her what it was. Oh yes, foreign visitors need to check out here, so there I gave it a try for the experience: fingerprint scans plus face picture and passport scan. I even received an (encoded) receipt from the Homeland Security (I keep it as a souvenir! See the scanned receipt, blacked out in part for “security reasons”). She said it is already 2 years there (never seen it anywhere else – did anybody?). I told her the US Government decided to stop the idea to process exits as they found out it was far too expensive to do it everywhere, especially when leaving by land (e.g. Mexico or Canada), they even tried with chips imbedded in the immigration form (RFID) but it did not work so well when people were leaving by car. Otherwise they have to build from scratch new exit immigration facilities. The lady had never heard about this and most probably will be worried now – that she might be out of a job soon. Unless she thinks this foreigner has no clue, yeah, right.

Indeed, in 1996 the U.S. Congress ordered immigration officials to create a system to track everyone who enters the USA and everyone who leaves. The Department of Homeland Security then set up the U.S. Visit Program. The system has been running since 2004. But news came out in mid December that the program monitoring foreign travelers when they leave has been abandoned due to prohibitive costs. So, after spending US$ 1.7 billion since 2003 on the U.S. Visit Program, the administration will keep doing what it has been doing at America’s exits, which is basically nothing (source: IHT – 30 December 2006).
I do read newspapers that teach me more about the USA than most Americans ever know. I think even China Daily is better than most of their crappy stuff called newspapers. Except the International Herald Tribune. But again, their head office is in Paris… As for TV, forget it.
I felt like going back to the information age when landing in Beijing. Here we know what is going on. Hey guys, believe me: China Daily really is not that bad. When they dish up their propaganda it is that obvious you don’t take them seriously. The rest at least keeps us in touch with the world. And of course we have actual news on TV. And the Internet of course. Well, maybe no Internet right now (and don’t forget to have your “backdoor” installed to avoid the “server not available” warning.)