China Shakes the World – James Kynge

Edited 1 July 06
On 14 June the EUCCC organized a breakfast event to let James introduce his book. Yeah, I know, one more.
I know James from the times he still was with the Financial Times and also bugged me (in a friendly way) as a journalist.

click to enlarge click to enlarge click to enlarge
His book, welcome words by Jörg Wuttke and James giving an entertaining talk

His book is said to be “an authorative account by leading China expert on how China’s economic rise and how it will affect the world”. The China Economic review in its June edition gave a positive report on the book – so did China Daily on 19 June on the front page – another glowing review.
I don’t completely agree with all of James’ statements but he makes many sharp and straight to the point observations leaning on his long experience dealing with China. He talks with a lot of humor – and modesty – setting him apart from the many so-called China specialists who think they understand China and all others have no clue.
James lists some of the strengths of China as well as some of the potential risk factors. Here I would add some more. We see fortress Europe and fortress USA against China’s rising economic trade volume but he did not talk about fortress China – many observers share the sentiment China is becoming more protective and trying to erect new barriers for foreign companies.
He also mentioned China is very closely following the western world in advanced technologies such as in the semiconductor industry. Here is were I tend to disagree – exactly in the IC industry China has been investing heavily but still fails to develop cutting edge technologies, one can even say China has a lot of catching up to do. Just look at a recent scandal where the darling researcher in the IC industry had to admit his new IC was just a recooked US chip – Chen Jing placed his company’s logos on several Motorola MOTO chips and claimed them as his own. As a consequence he was fired by Shanghai Jiaotong University.
Not to mention the development of mobile terminals – Motorola and Nokia again increasing their market share through their intensified R&D and marketing efforts after ceding grounds a few years ago to the myriad of local manufacturers. At one point it looked like foreign suppliers would become irrelevant. Not yet!
All in all, looks like a very interesting piece of work what James came up with. Now James, you have to improve your sales skills and carry some of your books for sale, so I can buy an autographed one from you.

Putin in, Shanghainese out

China is the top of the top to roll out the welcome mat to foreign VIPs. It is a friendly country. Mr. Putin and other dignitaries were attending the SCO meetings (Shanghai Co-operation Organization) in Shanghai some days ago. You don’t want those VIPs having to face all those crowds when visiting the Bund and attending their meetings. So, Shanghai, out of respect for the guests, closed down good part of the streets, several metro stations and kindly gave our Shanghainese friends a mini “Golden Week”. A bit of unplanned five-day bonus to go away from the city, travel agencies were busy trying to ship out the citizens while the railways were trying to cope with 570,000 holiday travelers, according to China Daily. It would also guarantee not to have too much laundry drying in the open and mahjong players on the streets.
Rumors were strongly denied that Beijing was sending a team to learn from Shanghai, to prepare for 2008.

Hollywood: a bad image for the USA

We appeal to Hollywood to follow the good example of China. Films should reflect on the positive sides of the country. Hollywood movies show too improper aspects of the USA: high criminality, gun fights, slow or corrupt police, dirty streets with rusting cars, graffiti, laundry drying on balconies, people playing cards on the streets, violent scenes, so many ugly things. Hollywood should promote abroad the image of the USA. Why not show only modern buildings, clean neighborhoods (Desperate Housewives and their famous Wisteria Lane is a positive example, as long as they don’t burn down their houses), friendly and fast-reacting police forces and all the nice things in “Mei Guo” (Beautiful Country = USA in Chinese).
We here are much more advanced. China cares about its image.
So, Mr. Tom Cruise, we don’t accept your version of Shanghai. Here we don’t have violent scenes and nobody plays mahjong on the street (I refer to China Daily), let not even think about drying clothes outside. We have laundry drying machines for that (OK, sometimes they don’t work because of the lack of energy in summer, but that’s exceptional).
Of course I am waiting for somebody to get me the 10 kuai unedited version of Mission Impossible III, not the sanitized version – I have been told by a friend the story seems to jump at times and she did not understand what was going on. Also, I want to see this mahjong stuff. What is it actually? Maybe they play it in the USA?
Not to wonder why we can buy all those pirated DVDs here: anti-US propaganda?
Now back to our CCTV series on kungfu and epic battles. Peaceful at least.

“Da Vinci Code” broken in China

The people in charge here are really funny.
The film took off as a success (I did not see it, I’ll wait for a good, full version DVD at 10 kuai). The movie was expected to beat ticket sales of “Titanic”. And then – poof. Gone, just like the Titanic. Well, you see, we need to have more domestic movies in the cinemas (evidently not the ones that get international awards, they are not good for your morals). Of course, the powerful Chinese Patriotic Catholic Church (or something like that) did not like the movie. As we all know the country is now following in the conservative footsteps of the USA and the Church prevails here. No gay marriage, no abortions, etc. Of course you guys don’t know this because you read the malignant foreign press. Wait a bit and we have even neocons here. We sure don’t want “social instability” because of this blasphemous movie.
Of course the brisk ticket sales were only halted once the movie distributor had made its intended minimum profit – because of “declining ticket sales” according to some official sources.
Of course I don’t know what others know or possibly don’t know, but I know I will never really know all I have to know. That’s what Rumsfeld would say, I guess.

The price of pollution

It’s official: pollution costs equal 10% of China’s GDP, costing the country more than US$ 200 billion a year, according to the State Environmental Protection agency. That’s pretty bad. At least the government is becoming more aware of the cost caused by the enormous industrial development and is honest to come out with the figures. Hopefully its plans to tackle the crisis will bring results.
Meanwhile in Hong Kong a report estimates air pollution costs the city US$ 2.73 billion a year – mainly because of the hospital bills and lost productivity. The level of air pollutants are said to be 3 times higher than the WHO guidelines and would be a cause of foreigners leaving.
I wonder what the situation is in Beijing. Better not to think about. Difficult when one looks out of the window. I often wonder living here is acceptable for my physical (and mental) health.