Further to my previous blog entry, see here some charts, from the SCMP, IHT (Floyd Norris) and China Daily. Click the images to enlarge!
One can learn a lot from those. I still believe that down the road China should be one of the first to get out of this mess but not without some suffering.
China’s trade figures reflect a downturn in exports but also of imports: as components needed for exports are less in demand and prices for crude oil & raw materials have tumbled.

Remarkable is the jump of China’s world ranking in GDP – but it also always raises doubt on the credibility of its figures…
The downward trend in world exports is anyway still the most ominous – just look for the ripple effect to come.
See also the Japanese consumer confidence sinking.

As I said… we are far from the end. For all the naïve people, good luck.
Some time ago we were making a prediction – “Black January” (nothing to do with the new US president…). See here some of the many snippets of news – just today:
Beijing said urban unemployment might rise to an almost 30-year high.
“We are in the middle of the economic Pearl Harbour right now,” Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffett told NBC in an interview aired on Sunday 18 January. “Now we have to get mobilised to win the war.”
Singapore said this week it is facing its worst-ever recession, and cut the economic outlook for 2009 to a contraction of between 2.0 and 5.0%. The downgrade is the second this month and reflects a faster and deeper decline in global economic activity, and stronger “spillover effects” on key sectors of the domestic economy, the Ministry of Trade and Industry said.
Mining giant BHP Billiton announced plans to slash its global work force by 6% – about 6,000 jobs – as it rushes to cope with plummeting demand because of the global financial crisis.
The United States‘ financial losses from the credit crisis might reach US$ 3.6 trillion, suggesting the banking system was “effectively insolvent”, said New York University professor Nouriel Roubini: “I’ve found that credit losses could peak at a level of US$3.6 trillion for US institutions, 50% of them by banks and broker dealers. If that’s true, it means the US banking system is effectively insolvent because it starts with a capital of US$1.4 trillion. This is a systemic banking crisis.
Losses and write-downs at financial companies worldwide have risen to more than US$1 trillion since the US subprime mortgage market collapsed in 2007.
Japanese government officials: Japanese consumer confidence fell to a record low last month as the country’s first recession in seven years heightened concerns about jobs and income, and the government cut its economic assessment for the fourth consecutive month. The world’s No 2 economy could deteriorate further if the financial crisis deepened and stock and currency markets stayed volatile. The economy is worsening rapidly. All economic indicators point to a rapid deterioration. It’s hard to imagine a recovery in the next few months. What’s unique about this recession is that it’s very steep. I can’t say when the downturn will hit bottom.

On 20 January we watched the changing of the guard in Washington – on CNN. First I thought I’d miss it, being stuck in the BTV studios for a TV recording but we came home, wanted to have a short look, did not plan to watch it al. We ended up going to bed near 2am as the events were so lively to watch (for once CNN did OK). Many of our friends (not all American) here did the same – got hooked and looked till very late. The enthusiasm of the crowds was unique.
We are all looking forward to the future though it will be tough. Enthusiasm in DC explodes into excess consumerism –  part of the economic stimulus plan? They even sell toilet paper (toxic ink, so don’t use it!), sex toys (anybody can explain?), hot sauce, all à la Obama. Most probably financed by China savings. Here we sure could use some of that creativity.
Let’s also wait and see how quickly Obama peddles back (as all U.S. presidents) on his rhetoric blaming China (currency speculation, etc.). China liked “Xiao Bu” (“Small Bush”) as he was a “trustworthy friend of China”. Chinese leaders feel a bit nervous with Obama as they don’t know him so well.
Time for closure anyway. SCMP came out the same day with this article – much in line with all media in Asia – including Mainland China.
20 January 2009 – “Bush leaves America divided and in a rut”
South China Morning Post
George W. Bush became the 43rd president of the United States in the shadow of a divisive election. He lost the popular vote but won after a controversial Supreme Court ruling on a disputed result in the state of Florida. He entered the White House promising to heal division by being a “uniter, not a divider”. He leaves it today as one of the most divisive and least popular presidents in US history.
Mr. Bush presided over a decline in America’s reputation and moral leadership. He led the nation into a disastrous war in Iraq, polarised it socially with a hardline stance on moral issues, and weakened it financially with tax cuts for the rich and extravagant spending. He leaves it in a deep recession arising from a financial crisis that resulted from lax supervision of investment banks. How did this happen to a man who campaigned for the nation’s highest office eight years ago as a “compassionate conservative”?
The answer lies in the terrorist attacks of September 2001. They would have tested any occupant of the White House. Thrown off balance, Mr. Bush came to rely heavily on an inner group of advisers, led by powerful vice-president Dick Cheney. They pushed him to the right with partisan politics, contempt for democratic checks and balances and disregard for the concerns of America’s allies.
By the time he campaigned for re-election in 2004, he had ditched the conventional political wisdom that he must appeal to the moderate middle ground, instead exploiting fears about national security and deep rifts on gay rights, abortion and stem-cell research.
The decision to invade Afghanistan in pursuit of al-Qaeda won international support and was popular at home. Not so the invasion of Iraq – without United Nations backing and on trumped-up evidence that it had acquired weapons of mass destruction – and the excesses of the ill-conceived “war on terror”. They left a litany of stains – among them the mistreatment of terror suspects and electronic spying on Americans without warrants – on values that have made America a beacon of human rights and the rule of law.
Mr. Bush showed little appetite for the details behind the big picture. People who meet him say he lacks curiosity. That was a trait that frustrated former British prime minister Tony Blair in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq, as he tried in vain to establish that Washington had a coherent plan for occupation and reconstruction.
There are also positives to take into account, such as his defence of free trade, efforts to raise school standards, resistance to political pressure to retaliate against China for holding the value of its currency down and a US$15 billion anti-Aids programme in Africa. As Mr. Bush points out, history will not judge him until long after he is gone. Sadly, his main legacy is an America whose reputation his successor needs to restore and whose people he must strive to unite.