Hein Verbruggen and Gilbert

Hein Verbruggen, 67 years old, was recently awarded the China Friendship Award, among a total of 12. It is the highest award China gives to foreign nationals who have made “outstanding contributions to the nation’s economic and social progress”. The next U.S. ambassador in Beijing is said to also have received the Award (not confirmed yet).
Gilbert received the same award on 29 September 2005 from then Vice Premier Ms. Wu Yi.
Verbruggen, from Holland, had led the IOC’s Oversight Panel for the 2008 Beijing Olympics and was thus deeply involved in the Beijing mega-show.
Gilbert too got the award for his long-term involvement in the preparation for the Olympics.
What Gilbert does not share however was the way to analyze the preparations: Verbruggen was rather sugar-coating everything to please Beijing. Gilbert has a reputation of being “rather out-spoken” (an understatement).
Verbruggen has since then left the IOC to seek “a quieter life”. Well, dear Hein, there we also share something. I’m happy it’s all over and feel it is still …. a bit early to make a final assessment of the mega-show.

Monument under attack

Here’s a legal question:


Is this statutory rape……or just a monumental mistake?
(Now I understand my U.S. friends who say those animals are real stupid and so easily get hit by cars…)

Sexy Beckham promoting sexual stimulant?

Sexy Beckham promoting sexual stimulant?
As reported by the media, like here in BizChinaUpdate:
A Beijing-based aphrodisiac manufacturer has produced an advert with Beckham and his wife Victoria seen gleefully endorsing, via Chinese-language dubbing, the effect the product has had on their sex life. Beckham gushes about the formula’s key role in “satisfying Victoria in bed.”
The faked advert uses footage of the Beckhams – along with “interviews” featuring Sean Connery and Keanu Reeves – to promote the sexual stimulant, called USA Selikon. The ad has gained a wide audience in China, both in the selected cities where it has been broadcast, and on the Internet where downloads of it are freely available.
The three stars clearly had no part in making the advert, and the footage has been obtained illegally and over-dubbed to give the impression that they are talking openly about their penchant for stimulatory Chinese medicines.
Nobody knows yet what Beckham’s reaction will be. But our Chinese friends are showing shameless commercialism (if it would be a joke – still acceptable…). Now just imagine that a similar fake video would circulate in the UK with Yao Ming promoting some British Viagra. You can expect a mass protest of the Chinese cybernationalists, the Chinese government calling the British ambassador to express indignation, the UK being a target of violence here in China.
Chinese can be so damned sensitive but are we always supposed to swallow their crap?
confuciussaid_61
Maybe I detect some Confucius influence here?

The sad story of the CCTV blaze

I was in a Rotary board meeting when it happened and only later in the evening we went to have a closer look. At that time (around 11pm) the building was still smoldering. Police and emergency vehicles were everywhere and so were busloads of military security forces. See my pics.
I collected some of the best pics, in the frenzy I am not sure where they all come from, some are from China Daily, South China Morning Post, Reuters, AFP, Tom Van de Weghe etc. Others are mine and dated.


You can see how the complex looked like in April 2008 and just a very few days before the blaze.
The 159-meter building is around a corner from the iconic CCTV main tower. It was not used during the Olympics, contrary to some reports and was due to officially open around mid-2009. The building is a 30-story luxury hotel, the 241-room Mandarin Oriental Hotel. The building seems doomed and insurance claims could be refused.
CCTV hired staff from a fireworks company (Hunan) to ignite several hundred large festive firecrackers in an open space outside the hotel, said Luo Yuan, spokesman and deputy chief of Beijing Fire Control Bureau. Total cost: 1 million RMB. Their idea was to organize the greatest of all fireworks and they were filming the whole process. A great show it indeed was…
We heard that a massive amount of fireworks were brought to the rooftop where they ignited by accident. This explains the massive explosions seen over the roof. The whole structure burned like a torch, using the aluminum façade as a conduit for the fire from the roof, down to the ground. Apparently no water was available in the building and the fire services of the city can’t cope with such high-rises. Scary.
The type of fireworks used is strictly banned in the whole city because of their dangerous nature.
In other words, some people in CCTV did incredible stupid things and planned nothing in fire prevention planning. The culprits promptly ran away when the fire started but the police caught up with them in Lanfang, halfway to Tianjin.
A massive amount of brand new TV equipment was stored inside. Losses could reach 5 4 billion RMB.
It is also a massive loss of face for the city.
The SCMP reported:
A mainland website poking fun at China Central Television’s programmes has become an overnight hit as netizens gloated over the fire that gutted a building in the complex of the state broadcaster’s new headquarters.
Netizens who claimed to have been subjected to CCTV’s whitewashed news reports and the mainland’s strict censorship said they were rejoicing in the fire.
Many said the fire was CCTV’s most entertaining event in decades.
The authorities ordered newspapers and websites to strictly follow Xinhua’s reports on the fire and banned any independent articles or unauthorised pictures. Journalists complained that they were banned from commenting on the fire.

If you see above a blank space,  🙁 most probably China has blocked YouTube or this video. It is supposed to show one of the best videos of the fire. You can go directly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avBkDtVCNng
Official media coverage was pathetic. Officials tried to prevent media coverage but that was impossible – one hour later it was on YouTube and other websites. Local Chinese newspapers simply ignored the “restrictions” and discussed about the drama in detail. But now pictures are gradually being removed.
We expect some heads to roll. Literally. Over ten people are already “in custody”.

The post-Olympic use of stadiums in Beijing

Gilbert was recently on Flemish TV (VRT).
Tom Van de Weghe made another interview with me on the legacy of some of the major Olympic venues. I feel sad how the Bird’s Nest – the project I helped to launch – has lost its original vision as a major sports and event arena. Officials are mostly to blame due to their interference. Important to stress here that it is NOT a “government” project – it is a project financed in part by the private sector under a Public Private Partnership scheme.
Now it is becoming an embarrassment as it stands there just for visits – planned events are months away and few. No soccer as nobody wants to play there and the owners are not interested either: maintenance costs to host a few soccer games are way to high.
All that happens when officials do not listen to good advice, think they don’t need foreign expertise (e.g. international operators) and mess it up.
The story of this architectural master piece is not yet at the end. Just wait. So sad for the architect Pierre de Meuron who had a correct vision.
In the video: Dieter Depypere (videos), Gilbert Van Kerckhove, Tom Tobback.
“Six months ago the world’s eyes were focused on China, when the Beijing Olympic Games kicked off spectacularly. Now that the spotlights are out, what’s happening with the Olympic infrastructure, and what’s the legacy of these Games for the Chinese? A report for Sportweekend.” So says Tom.
You can watch it on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/n/?video/video.php&v=53484921485&aref=17524202
Well done Tom!