Official API figures for June 2009

Here it is, my table for June 2009. Only one date I missed. Again, the same two locations.

click to enlarge

click to enlarge


Interesting is to note that the 2nd location, Agricultural Palace, is pretty close to the U.S. Embassy who has now its own monitoring station with a focus on PM2.5. So, the argument of China Daily and other Chinese “specialists” that the Embassy’s reading is in a (more) polluted zone being CBD does not make any sense. As one can see in my table, Dongsi is overall worse and there are still worse locations. Also, “CBD”? grab a map folks. CBD is several subway stations to the south!
More about the Embassy readings later (available on Twitter only). Yes, PM2.5 is very bad and my lungs are full with it. Our Chinese goons here don’t like it at all that the Embassy and others indicate how bad Beijing really is. Promptly all website links reporting on the bad air are blocked. Call it “Green Dam”. Keep the citizens in the dark.
Even when Beijing says the air is “good”, you better stay inside, switch on a good air filtering machine and refrain from heavy exercise.
Just an illustration: in the night pollution is generally bad as the trucks run (wildly) around. On 2 June 23:00 Embassy reports EPA AQI (Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality Index) of 157 “unhealthy”. Average of the day: 141 (unhealthy for sensitive groups). Compare that to Beijing official figure of API 56. The periods do not correspond completely but the difference is too large.
More to come, check the Pages on the right.

Green Dam story: “delayed”

On 30 June the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) said that China will delay mandatory installation of the controversial “Green Dam – Youth Escort” filtering software on new computers, because some computer producers have demanded extra time for such a massive installation. According to the MIIT’s previous announcement, all computers produced or sold in China were scheduled to have this software pre-installed starting July 1. But the MIIT will continue to provide a free download of the software and equip school and Internet bar computers with it after July 1. The MIIT will continue to solicit opinions to perfect the pre-installation plan. The software is designed to block violent and pornographic content on the Internet, to protect minors. It could also help parents control how much time their children spend online. The MIIT says the pre-installation will not be compulsory, as the software can easily be switched off and uninstalled by computer users. It will not track the online activities of users or collect any information about users. Accusations about privacy invasion by the software and concerns that it would create a block in information flow, which have been raised by a few overseas media and institutions, are groundless and irresponsible.
(Source: news.qianlong.com / SinoFile)
OK guys, let’s wait and see…

Election in Iran: “healthiest” ever

If you don’t agree, you are the enemy of “god” (whatever that means, small caps by purpose) and should be shot.
Sad case Iran right now. A worse bunch of medieval, crazy and retarded regime (except DPRK) is difficult to imagine. Iranians I’ve met (obviously outside of their country) are nice people. Wish they make their big bomb, screw it up and implode themselves. Oh well, I am not serious actually. Would be unjust for all the nice people over there, especially the women (of course they don’t count, they are just inferior beings).

some representative cartoons from the IHT

Normally I am not a big fan of Qadaffi, but earlier this month in Rome he said: “We need a feminist revolution. In the Arab-speaking Middle East, a woman is like a piece of furniture that one can change whenever one wants without anyone asking why”.
Of course, the turmoil in Iran is all the fault of the western media and satanic USA. Oh yeah? So, why are they so afraid to show what happens?
Damn Twitter, Facebook and the whole Internet. Bloody dangerous, all the fault of the USA (again)! Maybe better to shut it all down.
The goons over here are watching and learning, for sure.
For some countries, DPRK is the dream: one radio channel, one TV channel, one newspaper. Rest is banned.
Sure good for business and “creativity”.

China Daily first victim of Green Dam!

Google condemned as search results point to China Daily website! Well, could be. Too much skin. See here one of those offending pics on their site (and in print – front page!).
090625cdmodel
Will be interesting to see if those Chinese “government” sites will be shut down too.
The pathetic Green Dam story continues with the authorities not giving in. Maybe the good thing about all that: it might for once make their own netizens mad enough to counterreact.
In its continuing clampdown on dissent, pornography or whatever the Party is afraid of, now this:
“Access to information about sex on the Internet will be further restricted under a new regulation by the Ministry of Health. Under the regulation, which will come into effect on July 1, websites that link to sex-related studies and research can be accessed only by health professionals and researchers.
Under the new regulation, the MOH will better manage and monitor health-related websites, which are already required to be approved and registered with health authorities, said an official surnamed Yang with MOH’s information office.”
Of course anything related to information for not-so-straight people, AIDS/HIV awareness etc. will suffer. Many Chinese are not amused.
In recent years China is clamping further down on the media. Many expats here still don’t get it. (“no no, they can’t stop it”). We all hoped that after The-2008-Great-Clean-Up it would calm down but…
Isn’t it funny that all “people’s paradises” (or whatever you like to call it) countries who are supposed to liberate the masses and fight against “exploitation” are the worst to restrict the media, to shut up all dissenting voices, to control and restrict as much as they can? Happens in the following countries:  AAA, BBB, CCC, DDD, etc. (sorry, you have to fill in the names yourself). If it is all so nice and good in their country, what do they have to hide?

Trade frictions could worsen

Foreign companies in China are often discriminated in tenders where “genuine” Chinese companies are either exclusively invited or favored through all kind of tricks. Those are issues monitored by the European Chamber, through the Working Group I chair.
When authorities – often due to pressure from the central government – want to have only “real” Chinese companies, tenders are quickly announced on an obscure website or newspaper and if “foreign suppliers” show up they are told not to bother to bid as they will not be considered. Even if they do, the tender evaluation process can be easily manipulated.
Of course, difficult to prove as there is no trace on paper and foreign companies are warned not to protest unless they want to be blacklisted forever.
Now, the important point is that Wholly Owned Foreign Enterprises and Joint Ventures:
– are legally CHINESE entities;
– manufacture in most cases their products with a major local content (e.g. over 70%) – the case of wind power turbines;
– the foreign JV, in critical sectors, are minority owned by foreigners;
– have transferred their technologies at least in part to China;
– employ local workers (few expats) and pay their taxes (unlike the Chinese companies).
But the Chinese look “who is behind’ – if foreigners, forget it.
In the USA, States defend Japanese car companies as they provide local employment and are as American as Ford. Forget about that in China.
Recently the central government (e.g. NDRC) has strongly reacted to comments from the European Chamber that European windmill manufacturers have been excluded from tenders and are losing nearly all projects. The authorities claim “their windmills are too expensive” – nonsense – the EU companies could not even submit a price.
Authorities also claim the poor “domestic enterprises are discriminated in favor of imports”. Other complete nonsense. The cases we fight for are not imports but are locally produced.
The attitude and comments from the Chinese government are blatant lies and nonsense. Just a few days ago:
“Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao says cooperation between China and Germany has been developing smoothly in a variety of fields. He makes the remark during a telephone conversation with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in which the two leaders also discuss bilateral ties and other issues of common concern. He says the two sides should continue to handle their relations from a strategic and long-term perspective and keep up high-level exchanges. He says China would never discriminate against foreign enterprises or products. (Source: http://finance.qq.com)”
As I say, is equal to the announcement that “in China the Internet is free”. As pathetic.
With the world economic crisis, China was the first to go around the world and preach “against trade barriers”, like against the “Buy America” initiative – one that is by far much less of a trade barrier than China is erecting SINCE LONG.
It should be noted that many of the “big contracts” foreign companies get here are often misleading. The companies actually source most of the content on the local market.
So, if Foreign Direct Investment is falling, let it fall. Why should foreigners transfer technology and invest in factories when they are later on excluded from the domestic market?
In the case of the wind turbines it is all too clear:
– Chinese manufacturers are still behind foreign ones despite all their blatant efforts to copy and re-engineer foreign technology;
– the wind power market is very big, so China regards this as strategic and local companies should take the major market share at all cost;
– never mind quality and total life cycle cost;
– when China regards something as “important”, there are no more laws, no fair trade, just daylight robbery of technology and market share;
– “foreigners” doing (too) well in China is unacceptable.
China has killed many industries in the West. Of course, blame here the MNC who make big money through sourcing so much in China, seduce the consumers and make them dependent on cheap goods. Not all is bad – it can be good for the consumer up to a certain point.
But with the world economy still in a bad shape (ask Warren Buffett), we can expect the USA and EU to stop swallowing it all from China. On the other hand, the West has not much leverage and has only itself to blame (first being the U.S. – financed by China).
Anyway, it could be a rough ride.
[disclaimer: Gilbert Van Kerckhove is chair of the Public Procurement Working Group of the EUCCC – views expressed here are his own]