WTC3: still lost in Beijing haze

See here how Tower 3 of World Trade Center looks this morning. Same as yesterday. According to the Beijing Environmental Bureau, pollution index remains at a bit over 90 but in my area it could be rather 100-105. Again, PM10 particles still to blame. While that is much better than usual, a level of 100 is definitely NOT good for your health according to WHO criteria.

click to enlarge

Not a nice view. No wind to dispel the humidity that probably helps to catch the particles. The camera can hardly focus… For the 2008 Olympics, that will be the challenge. Even without the particles in the air, the windless and humid air can be a challenge for all, and there is little or nothing anybody can do about it. Except if the army installs some real big fans to blow it all away (just kidding). As I always say, pollution will not be a problem for the Games – but instead of a beautiful blue sky this is the other scenario where nobody is to blame. Let’s just hope for the best.

Beijing taxis / traffic / pollution / English

The car & traffic restrictions are apparently not providing the expected smooth ride and clear skies.
On 18 August my illegal observation station in Julong (located in my off-limits library) hardly detects the presence of China World Trade Center Tower 3. See here how it looked on 10 August (of course Jacques Rogge was here that day?).
click to enlarge WTC3 seen from my library (Julong) on a better day
According to SEPA’s website, pollution index for Beijing is now a little over 90 (grade 2); it says major pollution is caused by PM10. The index is said to include SO2, NO2 and particles (PM10, particulate matter smaller than 10 microns – masks are useless). Right.
Now the SCMP reports the following comments on the present anti-pollution test:
Scientists also questioned the validity of Beijing’s air-quality standards since they excluded two key pollutants – fine particulate matter and ground-level ozone concentrations – which could cause health problems.
Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau chief engineer Chen Tian said it had noted the issue, but the ongoing tests did not include the two categories.
“We are not monitoring these two things. We will consider them in the future. But there are many problems in standards and regulation. We need time,” Mr. Chen said.

Now, anybody can explain all this contradiction – are “fine particles” included or not? Particles are the real bad ones, exactly what is messing up my very own lungs. Good luck athletes.
Traffic yesterday was indeed better. The previous days, despite a general (non-published) ban on certain cars, traffic was hell as usual. Our own car is banned from 7 to 20 August (wrong plate) and my driver is enjoying a “voluntary holiday”.
Talking with taxi drivers is often fun, interesting and very challenging for my Chinese skills. Drivers commented pollution was, well, kinda difficult to solve. Too many cars, Beijing is surrounded by mountains, not enough wind, etc.
I asked one of the very talkative drivers how his English was as I heard the city was urging all drivers to learn English. His reply was simple. All talk/talk, no meaning and no progress. He tried a little and gave it up soon. He added: “I cannot even understand all Chinese, there are so many dialects in China. How am I supposed to understand all those different types of English, like Australian, American, British, etc.?”.
He has a point… Might explain why until today I never met a taxi driver who talk some useful words of English. And understand “Hilton Hotel” or Swissotel”.
Still wondering where all those English speaking Beijing ren are, all those millions as announced by the city. They must be on holiday, like my driver. Hopefully they will pop up on 8 August next year.

The energy police: again?

See other article from “Beijing Today” of 16 June: Beijing sends in the energy police
Quick, check the thermostat – the energy police are on patrol. Businesses in Beijing will have to be more aware of their energy use after the city formed a team to monitor energy-saving practices in response to the central government’s calls to cut consumption in big cities, state media reported. It quoted team leader Huang Qian as saying the “energy-saving police” will check if energy consumption in offices, hotels, schools, shopping malls and other big buildings meets national standards. A special phone number has been set up so the public can report buildings that fail to conform to the rules, Xinhua said. End of article.
OK, isn’t that great! But in the usual “transparency” the “special phone number” is not mentioned. For obvious reasons, the former vice mayor kindly and officially explained to me the energy police has no legal power to enforce the regulations. That was in 2006. At least he was one of the few officials to give a clear answer. I doubt today things are better. I’d love to denounce a couple of buildings, especially in winter time when you are dried out by hot air of 28 to 30C. Like in Powerhouse Gym.
As far as I know, the rules-to-be set indoor winter temperatures at 20C max and summer temperatures at 26C max. Yes, I know, hard to imagine in Beijing.

Julong Garden: kingdom of Chinglish

Our compound is considered a “foreigner’s compound” – important because the more foreigners live here, the more foreign TV channels we are allowed to get. Yes, it sounds like a stupid rule and it is. So, as they don’t identify enough laowai, we get just HBO, CNN, TV5 and a Japanese channel.
The management is very typical “Chinese”. In other words, very poor to mediocre. As an owner you have few rights and none to complain.

click to enlarge

With all those laowais around you could imagine they easily find help to check their English announcements. Of course, silly you. They never ask the right people who probably would be happy to help. It is typical of the majority of Chinese organizations and explains the abundance of Chinglish signs, some meaningless, some the source of jokes.
Julong Garden, in its quest to keep up with Chinese management characteristics, has again scored highly with this latest panel. The security guards don’t understand the enthusiasm of the inhabitants of taking a picture of the announcement. Rome was not build in a day, neither was Bingjing.

Repairing VCD players to save the environment

And of course, to enjoy the music. I use them as CD players. My old PIONEER CD player is getting old (yep, bought in 1989!) and can’t handle well the new generations of CD. Both of the “dumped” VCD players have a 3-CD loading dock.
It turned out after some time they started malfunctioning. I used an external CD cleaning disk, without success. My staff told me: “old”, just throw it, as giving it for repair would be half the price of buying a new one. Now, if this is not the ultimate stupid consumer excess situation we live in. As an engineer I could not accept to throw such nice pieces of electronic craftsmanship. Just open them to see the wonders of electronics.
So, the Philips VCD was sitting for two months in the office as my driver did not figure out when and where to throw it out.
Then my second VCD player (Changhong – 3 Disc Video-CD Player VD3000) started to die too. I promptly recovered the Philips and decided to give it a try. Normally I won’t do it because those players are real tricky to mess with. I dismounted the carousel (that was a challenge… to put it back). Checked it all, cleaned the laser eye with a cotton and alcohol. Surprise: all OK. Verdict: Beijing pollution plus deposit of the humidifiers. The CD lens cleaners are not up to that. Now the Philips is connected to the Pioneer installation (in my office) and works like new.

click to enlarge click to enlarge
the Philips 3 Disc VCD player CDC763V with carousel removed – back in service

So, next came the Changhong, same procedure, same success. Plays ago in my library.
Again, two pieces of nice equipment less to pollute the environment after being cannibalized. And I am enjoying my CDs again.